<p>Comparison of “new” and “old” PSA cut offs concerning specificity (spec), sensitivity (sens) as well as positive (pos pred) and negative predictive (neg pred) values stratified by age.</p
ODE versus PODE; SE, SP, accuracy, PIC, PPV, NPV for chosen cutoff values of RNFL thickness (average...
<p>Pairwise comparisons to distinguish the “suspects” from POAG and healthy controls.</p
LIBD- PITT differences in age and RNA-Seq quality technical parameters, plotted with statistical det...
<p>When the specificities were 80%, the sensitivities were 83% with PSA value of 19.0 ng/mL in the a...
<p>The sensitivity was 88% and specificity was 69% with tPSA cutoff value of 19.0 ng/mL in the age≤6...
<p>Positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity when classifyi...
<p>Sensitivity analysis comparing studies adjusted for age and sex vs unadjusted studies.</p
Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios of DIABSCORE cut-off points in par...
PsA vs, non-PsA—PASE-P sensitivity and specificity according to cutoff point.</p
<p>Cut-off scores for 6 conditions (3 age ranges by 2 educational levels), including sensitivity (SE...
<p>Cut-off scores for 6 conditions (3 age ranges by 2 educational levels), including sensitivity (SE...
Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios of DIABSCORE cut-off points in par...
Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve (AUC), and cutoff score among all parti...
<p>*Percentage</p><p>Sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predicted values (PPV) and negativ...
<p>Positive and negative predictive value, sensitivity and specificity for the different cut-off poi...
ODE versus PODE; SE, SP, accuracy, PIC, PPV, NPV for chosen cutoff values of RNFL thickness (average...
<p>Pairwise comparisons to distinguish the “suspects” from POAG and healthy controls.</p
LIBD- PITT differences in age and RNA-Seq quality technical parameters, plotted with statistical det...
<p>When the specificities were 80%, the sensitivities were 83% with PSA value of 19.0 ng/mL in the a...
<p>The sensitivity was 88% and specificity was 69% with tPSA cutoff value of 19.0 ng/mL in the age≤6...
<p>Positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity when classifyi...
<p>Sensitivity analysis comparing studies adjusted for age and sex vs unadjusted studies.</p
Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios of DIABSCORE cut-off points in par...
PsA vs, non-PsA—PASE-P sensitivity and specificity according to cutoff point.</p
<p>Cut-off scores for 6 conditions (3 age ranges by 2 educational levels), including sensitivity (SE...
<p>Cut-off scores for 6 conditions (3 age ranges by 2 educational levels), including sensitivity (SE...
Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios of DIABSCORE cut-off points in par...
Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve (AUC), and cutoff score among all parti...
<p>*Percentage</p><p>Sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predicted values (PPV) and negativ...
<p>Positive and negative predictive value, sensitivity and specificity for the different cut-off poi...
ODE versus PODE; SE, SP, accuracy, PIC, PPV, NPV for chosen cutoff values of RNFL thickness (average...
<p>Pairwise comparisons to distinguish the “suspects” from POAG and healthy controls.</p
LIBD- PITT differences in age and RNA-Seq quality technical parameters, plotted with statistical det...